In a 7-4 vote, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the state`s ban on magazines containing more than 10 rounds of ammunition — overturning a federal judge`s ruling that the law violates the rights of gun owners under the Second Amendment. A broader panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals met Tuesday to reconsider the constitutionality of a California law that prohibits residents from owning magazines of firearms containing more than 10 bullets — a case that is likely to have far-reaching implications for other outstanding challenges to the state`s broader efforts to regulate firearms. including offensive weapons. He added that the gun owner`s plaintiffs “have always identified a single person in California who actually fired 10 shots in self-defense” or someone else else in the country who could not build a successful defense after firing 10 shots. In its order Thursday, the Supreme Court ordered the U.S. 9th Court of Appeals to review its 7-4 decision last year, which upheld California law that bans magazines containing more than 10 bullets. The order adds to the long road to the San Diego-based trial in court.
A person charged under Criminal Code 32310 can challenge the charge by filing a legal defence. A good defense can often result in the reduction or even rejection of an indictment. Please note, however, that it is crucial for a defendant to hire a lawyer for the best defense. or may be manufactured, imported into the State, held for sale or offered for sale or exhibited, or which gives, lends, purchases or receives a magazine of large capacity. **Note that the application of Proposition 63 restrictions on the ownership of high-capacity magazines has been delayed pending a pending legal challenge by the NRA`s California subsidiary. To learn more about this case and the Work of the Giffords Law Center in defending Proposition 63, visit our Duncan v. Becerra summary page.** Unless another challenge arises, Prop 67, codified in our Criminal Code as section 32310, is now state law. For anyone living in California, this means that owning a magazine containing more than ten cartridges is illegal. It doesn`t matter if the magazine was bought or owned before this law. There are a few exceptions, but in general, if you own or possess a high-capacity magazine as defined, you must either remove it from the state, sell it to a licensed arms dealer, or hand the magazine over to a law enforcement agency. (Penal Code § 32310 (d).) Considering that, as noted by the Ninth District, half of all magazines located in America have more than ten towers, we can be sure that a significant number of these journals are currently owned by Californians. As it stands, what was legal yesterday is not legal today and continued possession of such a magazine can be charged with a violation with fines or as a misdemeanor with a prison sentence of up to a year.
Please note that certain persons and/or situations relating to high-capacity magazines are exempt from prosecution. For example, members of law enforcement agencies may sell, transfer, or possess these ammunition holders.6 With a few exceptions, California law prohibits any person from manufacturing, importing into the state, storing for sale, offering for sale, or suspending, giving, lending, purchasing, or receiving a high-capacity magazine.1 (A “high-capacity magazine” is defined as any device for supplying ammunition, which can hold more than ten cartridges. With the exception of .22 caliber ammunition magazines, magazines that have been permanently modified to hold no more than ten rounds of ammunition, or tube magazines contained in a lever firearm).2 In many cases of PC 32310, suspects are often arrested and charged after an undercover investigator has purchased a high-capacity magazine from them. However, all subsequent charges under Penal Code 32310 must be dropped if the officer deceived a suspect into committing the crime. The Attorney General`s Office, which requested the review into a ban, argued that banning high-capacity magazines was a reasonable response to minimize the frequency and lethality of mass shootings — a decision supported by data examining certain jurisdictions with and without such laws. A 2018 law in New Jersey limits most gun owners to magazines that contain up to 10 rounds of ammunition instead of the 15-shot limit that has been in place since 1990.
- 5 مهر 1401
- دستهبندی نشده
- 15 بازدید